// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved. // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style // license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
The codegen directory contains code generation tests for the gc compiler.
The test harness compiles Go code inside files in this directory and
matches the generated assembly (the output of go tool compile -S
)
against a set of regexps to be specified in comments that follow a
special syntax (described below). The test driver is implemented as a
step of the top-level test/run.go suite, called "asmcheck".
The codegen harness is part of the all.bash test suite, but for performance reasons only the codegen tests for the host machine's GOARCH are enabled by default, and only on GOOS=linux.
To perform comprehensive tests for all the supported architectures (even on a non-Linux system), one can run the following command
$ ../bin/go run run.go -all_codegen -v codegen
in the top-level test directory. This is recommended after any change that affect the compiler's code.
The test harness compiles the tests with the same go toolchain that is used to run run.go. After writing tests for a newly added codegen transformation, it can be useful to first run the test harness with a toolchain from a released Go version (and verify that the new tests fail), and then re-runnig the tests using the devel toolchain.
Instructions to match are specified inside plain comments that start with an architecture tag, followed by a colon and a quoted Go-style regexp to be matched. For example, the following test:
func Sqrt(x float64) float64 { // amd64:"SQRTSD" // arm64:"FSQRTD" return math.Sqrt(x) }
verifies that math.Sqrt calls are intrinsified to a SQRTSD instruction on amd64, and to a FSQRTD instruction on arm64.
It is possible to put multiple architectures checks into the same line, as:
// amd64:"SQRTSD" arm64:"FSQRTD"
although this form should be avoided when doing so would make the regexps line excessively long and difficult to read.
Comments that are on their own line will be matched against the first subsequent non-comment line. Inline comments are also supported; the regexp will be matched against the code found on the same line:
func Sqrt(x float64) float64 { return math.Sqrt(x) // arm:"SQRTD" }
It's possible to specify a comma-separated list of regexps to be matched. For example, the following test:
func TZ8(n uint8) int { // amd64:"BSFQ","ORQ\t\$256" return bits.TrailingZeros8(n) }
verifies that the code generated for a bits.TrailingZeros8 call on amd64 contains both a "BSFQ" instruction and an "ORQ $256".
Note how the ORQ regex includes a tab char (\t). In the Go assembly syntax, operands are separated from opcodes by a tabulation.
Regexps can be quoted using either " or `. Special characters must be escaped accordingly. Both of these are accepted, and equivalent:
// amd64:"ADDQ\t\$3"
// amd64:ADDQ\t\$3
and they'll match this assembly line:
ADDQ $3
Negative matches can be specified using a - before the quoted regexp. For example:
func MoveSmall() { x := [...]byte{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} copy(x[1:], x[:]) // arm64:-".*memmove" }
verifies that NO memmove call is present in the assembly generated for the copy() line.
There are three different ways to specify on which architecture a test should be run:
-- Write small test functions
As a general guideline, test functions should be small, to avoid possible interactions between unrelated lines of code that may be introduced, for example, by the compiler's optimization passes.
Any given line of Go code could get assigned more instructions than it may appear from reading the source. In particular, matching all MOV instructions should be avoided; the compiler may add them for unrelated reasons and this may render the test ineffective.
-- Line matching logic
Regexps are always matched from the start of the instructions line. This means, for example, that the "MULQ" regexp is equivalent to "^MULQ" (^ representing the start of the line), and it will NOT match the following assembly line:
IMULQ $99, AX
To force a match at any point of the line, ".*MULQ" should be used.
For the same reason, a negative regexp like -"memmove" is not enough to make sure that no memmove call is included in the assembly. A memmove call looks like this:
CALL runtime.memmove(SB)
To make sure that the "memmove" symbol does not appear anywhere in the assembly, the negative regexp to be used is -".*memmove".